One preferred name reused
Neutral baseline: editable values, but no source authority or change history.
Preparing verified demo information.
The application safety layer for public recruitment
Your Class X name and your current legal name are both correct. Career ID gives each question the source it asks for, and stops instead of guessing when a record is missing.
Independent hackathon prototype. Not an official government service.
Both answers are valid. The receiving question determines which source belongs in each field.
Interactive authority replay · Synthetic
Change the evidence and watch the real resolver recompute both receiving fields. It selects only what each reviewed policy supports.
This replay runs the real resolver against a fixed example, on this page only. It does not change the records in the working demo. Whatever you switch here, the citizen journey below still starts from complete evidence — remove a record inside the demo to carry that state through a whole application.
Neutral baseline: editable values, but no source authority or change history.
Every result keeps the receiving policy, source, version, and next action.
It repeats Aditya Kumar Sharma into both forms. That is an unsupported source for a field asking specifically for the Matriculation record.
Why ordinary reuse fails
The complete citizen journey
Each credential stays linked to its source. Each eligibility result stays linked to an approved rule. Each application stays linked to the profile version used.
Build a reusable, source-aware Career ID.
See every approved rule and why you match.
Reuse the right value from the right credential.
Keep each recruitment journey in one place.
AI extracts. Rules evaluate.
AI proposes notification rules once. A reviewer approves them. Deterministic code evaluates every citizen consistently.